For CHROs who need to measure manager effectiveness without surveys
AI meeting intelligence for CHROs who need to measure manager effectiveness without surveys
Leap gives CHROs a continuous, behavioral measure of manager effectiveness based on what managers actually do in their meetings, complementing lagging survey data with real-time behavioral signals from the management conversation itself.
What Leap is
Leap is AI meeting intelligence for managers. It sits in your 1:1s, standups, and planning sessions, captures every decision and owner as it happens, and tracks whether the work actually moved.
What it solves when surveys are not enough
Manager effectiveness surveys have three problems: they are infrequent, they capture how people feel rather than what managers do, and by the time you have results, the quarter is over. Leap measures manager effectiveness through behavior: whether decisions close in their meetings, whether ownership is clear, whether commitments are followed through. That is a more reliable and more actionable measure than survey sentiment.
Why CHROs who need to measure manager effectiveness without surveys choose Leap
Behavioral measurement, not sentiment measurement
Sentiment surveys tell you how people feel about their manager. Leap tells you what the manager is doing: whether they run meetings where decisions close, whether ownership is assigned, whether follow-through happens. Those behaviors predict team performance and retention more reliably than sentiment alone.
75% of managers show measurable progress when they can see their own execution patterns.
Continuous signal, not quarterly snapshot
A quarterly survey gives you four data points a year. Leap gives you a behavioral signal from every management meeting, continuously. You see trends as they develop rather than after they have already affected team performance.
On average, 30% of team meetings are identified as waste. Leap shows you where that pattern is concentrated and which managers are responsible.
Actionable data that points to specific behaviors to change
Survey results tell you a manager has a problem. Leap tells you what the problem looks like in their meetings: decisions that do not close, unclear ownership, the same blockers cycling without resolution. That specificity makes development interventions more targeted and more effective.
Companies using Leap see a 12% improvement in decision speed across their management layer.
Common questions
We are still going to run engagement surveys. Does Leap replace them?
Leap does not replace surveys: it complements them. Surveys give you the how-people-feel layer. Leap gives you the what-managers-do layer. Together they give you a more complete picture than either provides alone.
How do we know Leap's behavioral signals are valid indicators of effectiveness?
Meeting behavior is a direct proxy for management quality because meetings are the primary channel through which managers lead their teams. A manager who runs meetings where decisions close, ownership is clear, and follow-through happens is by definition managing more effectively than one whose meetings produce none of those outcomes.
Measure what managers actually do, not what they report
Book a demo to see how Leap gives CHROs a behavioral measure of manager effectiveness.